GQ has a wear it now section. Of course it’s bullshit, because the jacket this handsome dude is wearing is 3000 dollars. So of course, I won’t be wearing it now, I’ll be wearing it never. I was at the Gap today, I bought a pair, of ‘skinny jeans’ (probably, so two years ago) for 30 bucks. I think GQ should have a wear it now for under a hundred dollars section.
Photo by: Nathaniel Goldberg
This is my problem with the women’s fashion magazines. They say things like “Her look for Less!”, yet they’re still telling you to buy these $300 shoes. I mean, sure it’s less than the $5000 ones on (insert celebrity’s name here), but still not realistic.
-
caseyliz said:
this is what i am for! find something you like, and i will find the affordable version. it is the one useful skill that i possess.
-
westendgirls liked this
-
stealthecrownandkingdom reblogged this from walkwhilereading
-
folkinz liked this
-
the-partisan liked this
-
ecantwell said:
Oh man, women’s magazines are so bad about this. Even the “bargains” can top $500.
-
brianmlatimer liked this
-
mojasztukaireczy said:
congrats, friend!
-
benitez10yessi liked this
-
models-harmonicas liked this
-
elabor84me liked this
-
l3fan-o-rama said:
this is exactly how i feel on the men’s style flipboard. “ooooh, that’s perfect. shit, it’s also $700. for sneakers? I’m not made for this.”
-
l3fan-o-rama liked this
-
silver-age liked this
-
grilledcheeseandpearls reblogged this from walkwhilereading and added:
women’s fashion magazines. They say things like “Her look...Less!”, yet they’re still...
-
rowchygogo liked this
-
nerdshares liked this
-
grilledcheeseandpearls liked this
-
tumblingforth reblogged this from walkwhilereading
-
nat-filko reblogged this from walkwhilereading
-
nat-filko liked this
-
walkwhilereading posted this
